|
 |
members
in action |

JANUARY, 2007
WPEA Shares
Legislative Priorities with Many Legislators
WPEA member from Fish and
Wildlife,
Tom Burns, joined WPEA’s
lobbying efforts. We met with
Representative Bill Fromhold (D-Vancouver)
who was the Chair of the SCPP last year. His
voice is well respected among legislators on
this issue due to his tenacity and overall
knowledge of the State’s pension system.
Tom’s main argument was for a
“Rule of 85”
in PERS. He has worked hard on this issue, and
was motivated enough to provide Representative
Fromhold with a flier stating why a “Rule of 85”
is important to state employees who have worked
many years for the state, but are far from the
standard retirement age of 65. The
Representative was candid in saying this
legislation (HB 1199) will have steep
opposition. Fromhold did give members hope that
there was still time to stop the repeal of
gain-sharing, reinforcing the fact that members
can still influence the outcome.
Because the issue of gain-sharing
effects a very large majority of state
employees, WPEA has joined in coalition with
other state employee unions in demanding that
gain-sharing not be repealed. The Coalition is
finalizing a flier that will be distributed
liberally to all legislators to show how united
we are. You can do your part by
contacting your legislator NOW!

MARCH 2006
WPEA Settles
Work Schedule Grievance
WPEA/UFCW
365 has settled a long standing grievance filed prior to
the new contract in June of 2005. The grievance was
filed under the old contract and involved an email sent
by Dr. Koenings in June of 2005. The email changed the
conditions of your employment regarding the ability to
work alternate, flexible and telework schedules in
violation of the old contract article which stated the
union would be notified 21 days in advance of any and
all major changes in working conditions.
As you
all know the whole-sale change of work schedules for all
workers within the agency in July of 2005 has created
many problems. Efficiency in getting work accomplished,
ability to juggle family and work needs, maintain leave
balances, commute trip reduction and fuel consumption
difficulty including increased costs and not the least
nor the last, a plummeting morale were fall- out from
the email edict and it’s various interpretations by
middle management.
Happily,
on March 7, 2006 your co-workers and union leaders, Deb
Naylor and Norm Switzler along with WPEA/UFCW 365 staff
representative Marian Gonzales, struck a settlement
agreement with Cindy Lerch, Penny Cusick and Larry Peck
after approximately seven hours in mediation with a PERC
mediator. The agreement is as follows:
-
When requested by members of the WPEA/UFCW 365
bargaining unit, the supervisor will meet with the
members of the workgroup to review the workgroup’s
individual employee schedules.
-
As part of the process of reviewing these schedules,
the supervisor will take into account the business
and customer needs of the agency, commute trip
reduction provisions, and family care act
provisions.
-
If the supervisor and workgroup develop a scheduling
plan different from the currently approved workgroup
schedules, the written recommendation will be
presented to the appropriate Appointing Authority
for consideration. This recommendation will be
given appropriate weight during the consideration
process, taking into account the business and
customer needs of the agency, commute trip reduction
provisions and family care act provisions. If the
workgroup’s plan for alternate schedules is denied
by the Appointing Authority, the workgroup will be
provided the reason for the denial.
If one
individual within a workgroup needs their schedule to be
reconsidered for the same criteria above, that person
can make an individual request for the supervisor to
work with them on putting forward a new request that
meets business and customer needs and also allows for
commute trip reduction and family care needs.
This
agreement paves the way for a renewed sense of
constructive labor relations between WPEA/UFCW 365 and
DFW. It may not seem like much to some but it is a good
start. It is important to note that we also have new
contract grievances filed on this very same issue.
It is
important that WPEA/UFCW 365 is notified of any denial
of schedules that meet business and customer needs, are
consistent with the job duties as assigned and assist
employees in commute trip reduction and family care. We
would have the right to file grievances on those denials
under the new contract and should. If you have
questions please feel free to call Marian Gonzales at
(360) 943-1121 EXT 118 or 1-800-544-9732 EXT 118.

FEBRUARY 2006
Union Helps Agency
Transition to Performance and Development Plan
The Department of Fish and Wildlife is
transitioning to the Performance and Development Plan
(PDP). This evaluation tool was reviewed by WPEA/UFCW
365 and has been approved for use in the collective
bargaining agreement we negotiated with the Labor
Relations Office for use as of July 1, 2005.
Recently, the Department of Fish and
Wildlife requested to change all our bargaining unit’s
evaluation period dates and unify all evaluation dates
to March. Your union, WPEA/UFCW 365, requested
information on the proposed annual review date changes
and to bargain the impacts of such changes prior to any
change taking place.
We met with management on February 17,
2006, to get clarification on the proposed change and to
discuss the following concerns we had:1) employees being
evaluated for more than a one year period; 2)
employees being evaluated for less than a one
year period; and 3) employees being evaluated without
appropriate PDP position description, goals and
expectations, and training on the new tool.
We are happy to report that the
Department of Fish and Wildlife and WPEA/UFCW 365 agreed
to the following stipulation on the proposed evaluation
date change for our employees:
The terms, as set out in the February 17,
2006 meeting and two subsequent letters dated February
23, 2006 and February 24, 2006 are as follows:
-
For those employees who received
evaluations in August, September and November of
2005 and who had PDP goals and expectations,
position updates and essential job duties reviewed,
these PDP mandated items would be reviewed in March
of 2006 for appropriateness. Their evaluation year
would start in March 2006 to be completed in March
of 2007.
-
The months prior to March of 2006
would fall off and not be part of the evaluation
year for those employees.
-
For those employee’s who did not
have PDP goals and expectations, position
description updates and essential job duties
reviewed in 2005, theirs would be set in March
of 2006 within appropriate PDP guidelines and they
would then be evaluated in March of 2007.
-
DFW will not conduct interim
evaluations for our employees.
No evaluations of more than a year, in
whole or in part will take place. No evaluations of less
than a year will take place. All Bargaining Unit
Employees will be allowed to, and encouraged, to take
the Performance and Development Plan Training
that is mandatory for all supervisors. All employees
will be given a training guide with the training.
Management has agreed to offer a
couple more training sessions for all interested
bargaining unit employees. Please ask about and
look for the training notices.
Sue Vance
is the Human Resource Contact for these trainings.
Some important things to remember:
-
You have a right to and should be
reviewing your supervision and personnel files
at least quarterly.
-
The evaluation of your
performance needs to be based on actual
evidence. This evidence is contained in actual
work products, on documentation from your
supervisor to you, and from you to your
supervisor.
-
Deadlines should be clear,
obtainable and flexible if actual obstacles to
work completion arise. You should be given
appropriate training and support in doing your
job.
-
You should have access to the
information you need to conduct your job and
meet performance goals. Clear communication
should be in evidence between you and management
and between management and you. Supervisors
often keep some kind of documentation file. You
have a right to review this file and should do
so at least quarterly.
-
Please request a copy of the PDP
guidebook, and other training materials that
have been made available to your supervisors.
These materials include the how to of
creating a position description, how to define skills
and abilities needed for work, how to create appropriate
and work related goals and expectations, in addition to
how to use the PDP evaluation tool.
Please have your name put on the training
list TODAY! Ask for the guidebook and other tools that
have been given to supervisors for the training.
If you have questions, please contact
Marian
Gonzales at (360) 943-1121, ext 118 (if
outside Olympia call 1-800-544-9732, ext. 118).

FEBRUARY 2006
WPEA Files Exchange Time
Grievance
WPEA has filed a grievance on behalf of
all overtime exempt employees. The grievance was filed
on the heels of Lew Atkins’ memo to our bargaining unit
employees changing how Exchange Time will be accumulated
and used. This memo demonstrates management’s
misunderstanding of the contract and in general labor
law, to say the very least.
It is an unfair labor practice to change
the conditions of employment without notification to –
and bargaining those changes with – the exclusive
bargaining representative. Atkins did not notify WPEA
that he was changing Exchange Time accumulation or use
and did not give the union a chance to bargain the
changes.
Management had a chance to bargain
changes in Exchange Time at the bargaining table prior
to July 1, 2005 when your current contract took effect.
To change now without notification is a violation of the
bargaining process and of your contract language on
Exchange time.
Please note no changes in your Exchange
Time leave banks or use should take effect until this
issue is resolved.
If you have questions, please contact
Marian
Gonzales at (360) 943-1121, ext 118 (if
outside Olympia call 1-800-544-9732, ext. 118).
|