Getting Your Grievant to Maintain Confidentiality

In our last article, we addressed the Job Rep Creed of MAINTAINING CONFIDENTIALLY and how it can adversely affect everyone if it is not honored. Likewise, the grievant must also adhere to maintaining confidentiality, or in other words, keeping his or her mouth shut. For the Job Rep this can be dubbed as “Mission Impossible!”

In many instances, by the time the Job Rep is contacted for assistance, the situation for the grievant has progressed to the point where it has consumed the grievant’s life.

In some cases, it can and actually does cause physical and emotional side effects. This is one of the ultimate challenges for the Job Rep to deal with, as by this time, the grievant usually isn’t coping well and just wants the situation to go away at any cost – an extremely dangerous situation.
Once the Job Rep has a good grasp of the situation he/she needs to make an assessment of the grievant’s emotional state and his/her support system. It is not uncommon to discover that the grievant has little or no support regardless of marital status or community involvement.

Sometimes, the grievant perceives the only source for support to be from co-workers and goes out of his or her way to garner support and/or sympathy. Here are two cases to show how this can adversely affect desired outcomes:

#1 - The Case of the E-Mail Big Mouth:

John was upset because Sue was promoted to become his supervisor. John was incensed and let everyone in his work unit know exactly so.

He wanted to file a grievance and contacted his Job Rep. The rep, after analyzing the facts, told John he didn’t have a case.

John made every effort to avoid Sue to the point of only communicating via e-mail. Sue, being no dummy, attempted to reach out to John without success and ultimately became very frustrated. The e-mails became more and more intense between the two.

John, started to forward them to his Job Rep in the hopes of finding something to file a grievance over. What the Job Rep didn’t know is that John was blind carbon copying (bcc) co-workers both within and outside of his work unit in an attempt to discredit the Job Rep and portray Sue as a villain. As a result, the situation was a source for jokes about John not only from his co-workers, but also management,
as well.

John ultimately was reassigned to another supervisor, but carries a label of being “less than a perfect employee” to this day.

#2 - The Case of the Vindictive Grievant :

Tim just couldn’t seem to do anything right to satisfy his boss, Steve. Tim was seasoned enough to have the good sense to keep records of conversations between himself and Steve.

All of Tim’s co-workers (in his classification) were experiencing the same type of treatment from Steve and tried to lay low. Steve had been around for a long time and had been getting away with this behavior for years and since Tim was the target, they could breathe a little easier.

Ultimately, Tim was charged with insubordination. At the pre-disciplinary meeting, the Staff Rep was able to paint a convincing portrait of Steve as being a dinosaur in terms of his management style through data provided by the agency such as turnover rates, new hire lag times and disparate treatment of employees depending on their classification. This caused the agency to launch its own investigation of Steve.

The Staff Rep told Tim that Steve was going to be investigated and to just chill out and keep his mouth shut.

Unfortunately, Tim did the opposite and saw this as a means of being vindicated and contacted any co-worker he trusted within the region and encouraged them to speak out. So, the word spread like wildfire and Tim’s co-workers didn’t wait to be contacted by the HR investigator, but rather sought him out.
The results of the inquiry were essentially that yes, it appeared that Steve’s management style was somewhat draconian, but it was obvious that this was a mass effort to get even with him. Thus, a pretty solid case was compromised.

What to Do?

Remember, in most cases the situation has consumed the grievant. The Job Rep needs to:

  • Assess where the grievant is in terms of support – family, friends, co-workers and church. Many times they feel they have no one to turn to for various reasons.

  • Encourage the grievant to seek assistance from the Washington State Employee Assistance Program (EAP).

  • And, if you discover that the grievant has no support system in place, then make yourself available to be a sounding board until a support network can be established. This can be a drain on your time and energy, but remember, you’re dealing with someone who needs not only help, but a friend, during this low point in
    their life.

 

 

 

  Return Job Rep Corner Home Page

about wpea | cbas | contact us | events calendar | home | issues & actions | job reps | join today | representation rights | resources | site search | top | wpea this week

Copyright 2007 © Washington Public Employees Association/UFCW 365     140 Percival Street NW, Olympia, WA 98502     1-800-544-WPEA     (360) 943-1121     All rights reserved.